Corporate responsibility within the European Union has taken a significant leap forward with the implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
This directive serves as a cornerstone of the EU’s comprehensive strategy to enhance corporate transparency, integrate sustainability into core business strategies, and foster long-term growth.
At the heart of this directive are the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), which are designed to standardise how companies report on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, ensuring that sustainability disclosures are consistent, comparable, and actionable across the EU.
Let's delve into the specifics of ESRS and examine their implication.
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) develops the ESRS standards through an inclusive, multi-stakeholder process that incorporates insights from industry experts, policymakers, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and academics. This approach guarantees that the standards are robust and practical for diverse industries and sectors.
The ESRS reflects the EU’s commitment to embedding sustainability in its economic model, aligning closely with the objectives of the European Green Deal, which sets a roadmap for Europe to achieve climate-neutrality by 2050 and promote inclusive, sustainable growth.
By establishing a common language and quantitative metrics for sustainability reporting, the ESRS addresses key policy goals, including advancing sustainable finance, strengthening investor confidence through transparency, and encouraging companies to align with the transition to a low-carbon, circular economy.
The standards are designed to address the EU’s sustainability goals and harmonise with global frameworks that guide corporate sustainability reporting. This alignment reduces the reporting burden for multinational companies and ensures consistency in sustainability disclosures worldwide.
Key global frameworks integrated within the ESRS include:
At its core, the ESRS framework establishes a comprehensive, unified methodology for reporting sustainability metrics, enabling companies to communicate their performance effectively to stakeholders.
The ESRS framework’s "double materiality" principle is a defining feature that sets it apart from traditional financial reporting standards. Double materiality requires companies to evaluate two dimensions of their sustainability impact:
This dual perspective broadens the scope of corporate accountability, urging companies to consider not only shareholder value but also responsibilities to the planet and society.
The implementation of ESRS is structured in phases to allow companies sufficient time to adapt to the new requirements.
Initial sets of general and topical standards have already been adopted, while sector-specific standards are being developed with a phased rollout planned through 2026. These sector-specific standards will address unique sustainability challenges and opportunities within industries like energy, agriculture, textiles and finance.
The ESRS framework is structured into four broad categories: General, Environmental, Social, and Governance. Each category encompasses specific themes with detailed disclosure requirements designed to capture the nuances of sustainability performance.
These standards set the foundational approach for CSRD reporting and apply uniformly across all ESG topics. They define key structural elements such as reporting boundaries, materiality assessments, and governance disclosures.
Reporting obligations: mandatory cross-cutting standards include:
In contrast, topical standards address specific and well-defined themes within the ESG spectrum, providing detailed and actionable guidelines for reporting on particular issues such as climate change, biodiversity, social equity, and governance practices. These standards align with the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) framework, ensuring harmonisation and compliance.
Each topical standardises into the details of a specific sustainability area, requiring metrics and disclosures that are both qualitative and quantitative, tailored to the unique materiality of the topic. This ensures relevance and consistency in reporting.
This targeted approach allows companies to report on each sustainability aspect with specificity, ensuring that stakeholders receive granular, relevant information about a company's impact and performance in critical areas.
Reporting obligations: based on double materiality analysis except for ESRS E1, which operates under the rebuttable presumption principle. Under this principle, an organisation is required to demonstrate that it is not significantly affected by climate-related issues. Failing this, the organisation is obligated to report on climate concerns, aligning with ESRS guidelines.
Reporting obligations: based on double materiality analysis
These themes collectively provide a structured framework to ensure that sustainability reports across different companies are materially relevant, comparable, and transparent, aligning with CSRD compliance requirements.
Don't miss out on the specifics and implications of each standard of ESRS!
Access the full details of the disclosure requirements for each theme of ESRS with our guide, designed to provide your organisation with insights to better navigate CSRD reporting. Click here to claim your copy.
Sector-specific standards are being developed to complement the general and topical ESRS, with around 40 sectoral criteria expected to be published by the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG).
By early 2025, EFRAG will introduce the first draft of sector-specific standards. These are expected to be adopted by the European Commission by 2026 to guide companies in high-impact industries, such as oil, gas, mining, and coal, followed by the financial, apparel, and agriculture sectors.
Assess whether your company already tracks the necessary data required for compliance with CSRD regulations. Is your data collection comprehensive and reliable? For instance, do you have clear metrics for carbon emissions, energy consumption, water use, waste management or social initiatives? If your data is incomplete or scattered across various departments, now is the time to establish a centralised and scalable data management system.
Additionally, evaluate your internal capacity: does your team have the expertise to handle the complexities of CSRD requirements, or will additional resources or training be necessary? Consider integrating cross-departmental ESG training programs to ensure alignment across all levels.
The CSRD introduces the concept of double materiality, requiring companies to assess not only the financial materiality of ESG issues but also their environmental and social impacts.
Start by gathering data from both internal and external sources, carefully analysing stakeholder expectations, regulatory obligations, and industry-specific impacts. For example, consider conducting stakeholder surveys or using external ESG data providers to validate your assessments. Through discussions with relevant departments and key stakeholders, identify and prioritise ESG issues, mapping how these intersect with their operations and strategic objectives.
After evaluating both financial and impact materiality, rank the issues based on their significance. This ranking will help you focus on the most material sustainability topics for your reporting. Issues scoring highly in both dimensions require particular attention, although even those ranking highly in only one may still warrant inclusion in your disclosures.
Once you have a clear view of your company’s most material ESG issues, determine which ESRS apply to your report. This step can be challenging, as companies may struggle to keep track of the connections between various disclosure requirements, leading to confusion and inefficiencies in reporting.
At Apiday, we simplify this by automatically identifying the applicable ESRS standards based on your materiality assessment and generating custom ESRS questionnaires, enabling seamless data collection and compliance.
To effectively align data collection and reporting practices with regulatory expectations, it’s essential for companies to fully comprehend the scope and depth of these requirements, ensuring no critical information is missed.
Begin by gaining a thorough understanding of ESRS 2, which defines the “Minimum Disclosure Requirements” (MDRs) that all companies must follow.
ESRS requires both qualitative and quantitative data. For qualitative disclosures, you should detail the contents, objectives, and implementation scope. If any policy or action is missing, it should be noted transparently. Quantitative data requirements range from simple percentages to more complex, detailed tables. These tables must follow standardised formats outlined by the ESRS for consistency.
Additionally, ensure alignment with EU Taxonomy objectives and sector-specific ESRS requirements, where applicable, to provide a comprehensive sustainability picture. This includes linking ESG metrics to financial performance and integrating scenario analyses, such as those recommended by the TCFD.
The CSRD requires limited assurance initially, escalating to reasonable assurance audits over time, ensuring credibility and alignment with ESRS standards. Similar to financial audits, third-party auditors will verify that ESG data is accurate, complete, and follows ESRS and EU Taxonomy alignment requirements.
Engage with auditors early to better understand their expectations, align processes, and avoid delays in the verification process. Establish a clear audit trail by documenting methodologies and maintaining organised records of all data sources and calculations.
Mapping where each type of data is stored and ensuring each department understands its role in the reporting process is crucial. If you rely on third-party providers for data like emissions or supply chain management, coordinate with them for timely and accurate information.
Assign a data owner for each key data point—a person or team responsible for collecting, maintaining, and verifying it.
Establish proper controls to prevent errors or duplications, and use a centralised data management system with built-in ESG reporting capabilities to minimise mistakes and maximise efficiency.
Conducting a gap analysis helps identify areas where your company may be falling short and offers direction for improvement.
Review ESRS disclosure requirements and assess each data point to confirm whether it’s currently being collected and reported by your company. Pay special attention to new requirements introduced under ESRS, such as mandatory reporting on biodiversity impacts, supply chain emissions, and social equity.
This analysis should be an ongoing practice, not a one-time task. Even after closing initial gaps, it's important to continually reassess your reporting to stay aligned with evolving requirements.
Make sure that each key performance indicator (KPI) in your report is linked back to its original data source.
Provide clear documentation of the methodologies used to calculate each metric, whether it's emissions measurements or social impact assessments.
A key requirement is machine-readable digital tagging using XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language), which standardises your report, making it easier for regulators and auditors to process, compare, and verify the information. Failure to adopt digital tagging could lead to regulatory scrutiny or non-compliance. .
The Directive’s impact is poised to be profound. If your company must comply with the CSRD, you should begin immediately.
The deadline is rapidly approaching, and the consequences of noncompliance can be significant.
At Apiday, we provide an end-to-end solution for CSRD compliance, from conducting materiality assessments to generating fully compliant reports. Our platform ensures you stay ahead of the curve while minimising the resource burden on your team.
Take the first step towards CSRD compliance now—book a no-obligation session with one of our experts to explore how we can support your journey.
If your company must comply with CSRD, you should begin immediately!
Our cutting-edge tool is here to guide you on the right compliance track, gathering data and automating the creation of disclosure reports. With everything you need to be fully compliant in a single platform, take the first step towards CSRD compliance now!
The ESRS are a set of standards developed to provide a framework for consistent sustainability reporting across the EU. They detail how companies should report on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors to meet CSRD requirements.
The ESRS help companies by standardising ESG reporting requirements, thus ensuring transparency and comparability. This assists investors in making informed decisions and supports companies in managing their sustainability risks more effectively.
Implementing ESRS can be challenging due to the need for significant improvements in data collection, management, analysis, reporting, alongside training staff to understand and meet detailed reporting requirements specified by the ESRS.
Take action and empower yourself with the knowledge, tools, and strategies to navigate CSRD successfully!